0CRX071
Replacement Lower Tooth to Multiple with Autologous Tissue Substitute, Open Approach
Procedural Specifications
| Clinical Axis | Detail Definition |
|---|---|
| Section | 0 Medical and Surgical |
| Body System | C Mouth and Throat |
| Operation | R Replacement |
| Body Part | X Lower Tooth |
| Approach | 0 Open |
| Device | 7 Autologous Tissue Substitute |
| Qualifier | 1 Multiple |
Operation Definition
Putting in or on biological or synthetic material that physically takes the place and/or function of all or a portion of a body part
Procedure Overview
This group of procedures involves putting in biological or synthetic material to physically take the place of mouth or throat tissue that has been removed or is missing, whether from a birth difference, cancer surgery, or severe trauma. Reconstructing a palate defect with a graft that substitutes for absent tissue, or placing material that stands in for a resected portion of the tongue or pharyngeal wall, fall into this category. Unlike a simple repair, the point is not to close existing tissue but to fill a gap with something that now functions as the missing part.
These procedures are most often planned as a second stage after cancer resection, or performed following extensive trauma such as gunshot wounds or animal bites that leave tissue that cannot be reattached. The material used may come from the patient's own body elsewhere, from donor tissue, or from a synthetic implant, and the choice depends on the size of the defect and how much the reconstructed area needs to withstand chewing, swallowing, and speech.
Anatomy & Axis Detail
Lower Tooth
A lower tooth sits within the mandibular alveolar bone and, like its maxillary counterpart, may require replacement following loss from trauma, extraction, or disease when the intent is to restore a functional tooth substitute rather than perform routine dental care. Because the mandible undergoes substantial mechanical stress during mastication and must maintain occlusal harmony with the upper arch, any replacement tooth needs secure anchorage in the alveolar bone and precise alignment to avoid disrupting bite mechanics or jaw joint function. Options include transplanted natural teeth or prosthetic substitutes integrated with the mandibular ridge. As with upper tooth replacement, documentation should identify the specific tooth involved and the replacement material used, since these details determine long-term stability and functional restoration.
Approach: Open
Open approach means the surgeon cuts through skin, mucous membrane, or other tissue layers to physically expose the target site to view before performing the procedure. It gives direct visualization and hands-on access, distinguishing it from Percutaneous approaches where instruments pass through a small puncture without exposing the site. Open is typical for procedures needing wide access, such as most laparotomies.
Device: Autologous Tissue Substitute
Autologous Tissue Substitute identifies a device value where material harvested from the patient's own body, such as an autograft, is used to replace or reconstruct a body part. Its defining feature is tissue origin from the patient, setting it apart from Nonautologous Tissue Substitute, sourced from a donor or animal, and Synthetic Substitute, made of manufactured material.
Qualifier: Multiple
This qualifier specifies that more than one, but not all, of a defined set of body parts were treated in the same procedure, such as several vertebral joints or vessels. It falls between Single, used for one structure, and All, used when every structure in the set was addressed.
Coding & Documentation
Documentation should clearly show that a body part or a defined portion of it is missing and that material was put in to physically stand in for it, rather than reinforcing tissue that is still substantially present. Coders should watch operative reports for terms like "free flap reconstruction," "graft placement to replace," or "prosthetic obturator" that describe filling an absent structure. A frequent error is coding supplement when the underlying body part is largely intact and the graft is only adding bulk or support; if native tissue still performs the function and the graft merely reinforces it, supplement is correct instead. Another pitfall is missing that the replacement material's insertion is bundled into a combined resection-and-reconstruction operative session, which often requires two separate codes.