0HWT37Z
Revision Breast, Right to No Qualifier with Autologous Tissue Substitute, Percutaneous Approach
Procedural Specifications
| Clinical Axis | Detail Definition |
|---|---|
| Section | 0 Medical and Surgical |
| Body System | H Skin and Breast |
| Operation | W Revision |
| Body Part | T Breast, Right |
| Approach | 3 Percutaneous |
| Device | 7 Autologous Tissue Substitute |
| Qualifier | Z No Qualifier |
Operation Definition
Correcting, to the extent possible, a portion of a malfunctioning device or the position of a displaced device
Procedure Overview
Revision procedures address a device already implanted in the skin or breast that is no longer working correctly or has shifted out of position, without fully replacing it. This covers situations such as repositioning a displaced breast implant, adjusting or repairing a malfunctioning tissue expander, or correcting a poorly seated dermal graft carrier. The goal is to restore proper function or placement using the existing device to the extent that is medically possible.
People need this type of procedure when they experience implant malposition, capsular contracture affecting device function, expander port problems, or other mechanical device issues discovered on exam or imaging. Surgeons evaluate whether the existing device can be salvaged and repositioned or repaired in place, which is generally a less extensive undertaking than removing and starting over with new hardware.
Anatomy & Axis Detail
Breast, Right
Revision of the right breast corrects problems arising from an earlier procedure on that breast, most often an implant that has ruptured, migrated, or developed capsular contracture, or a reconstructive flap or graft that has partially failed. Common scenarios include implant malposition after augmentation, symmastia correction, capsulectomy for contracture, or adjustment of an autologous flap that has undergone partial fat necrosis or asymmetric healing. Because the right breast may have a different surgical history than the left, from timing of original surgery to implant type or flap choice, laterality is essential to accurate documentation. Revision is distinguished from Supplement or Replacement by its corrective purpose: the surgeon is fixing or adjusting a prior device or repair rather than adding new reinforcing material or replacing the structure entirely.
Approach: Percutaneous
Percutaneous describes entry by needle or instrument puncture through the skin or mucous membrane to reach the site of the procedure, without cutting the tissue open or using a visualizing scope. It differs from Open in that the site itself is never exposed, and from Percutaneous Endoscopic in that no endoscope is used to see internal structures. Common examples include needle biopsies and injections.
Device: Autologous Tissue Substitute
Autologous Tissue Substitute identifies a device value where material harvested from the patient's own body, such as an autograft, is used to replace or reconstruct a body part. Its defining feature is tissue origin from the patient, setting it apart from Nonautologous Tissue Substitute, sourced from a donor or animal, and Synthetic Substitute, made of manufactured material.
Coding & Documentation
Correct assignment depends on documentation clearly stating that a device already in place was corrected, adjusted, or repositioned rather than removed and swapped for a new one. The note should describe the specific problem found, such as displacement, malfunction, or a leaking or deflated component, and confirm the same device remained after the procedure. A common error is applying Revision when the surgeon actually removed the old device entirely and inserted a brand-new one, which is coded as Removal combined with Replacement or Insertion, not Revision. Coders also sometimes overlook Revision when a note uses casual language like "repositioned the implant" without stating the device stayed in place, so it is worth confirming the device identity did not change before finalizing the code.