0PWG07Z
Revision Humeral Shaft, Left to No Qualifier with Autologous Tissue Substitute, Open Approach
Procedural Specifications
| Clinical Axis | Detail Definition |
|---|---|
| Section | 0 Medical and Surgical |
| Body System | P Upper Bones |
| Operation | W Revision |
| Body Part | G Humeral Shaft, Left |
| Approach | 0 Open |
| Device | 7 Autologous Tissue Substitute |
| Qualifier | Z No Qualifier |
Operation Definition
Correcting, to the extent possible, a portion of a malfunctioning device or the position of a displaced device
Procedure Overview
This family covers procedures that correct a problem with hardware already implanted in one of the upper bones - the skull, facial bones, sternum, ribs, or the cervical and thoracic vertebrae, scapula, clavicle, or humerus. A patient who had a plate, screw, rod, or other fixation device placed after a fracture or spinal surgery may develop a loose screw, a bent plate, or hardware that has shifted out of its intended position. Revision procedures adjust, tighten, reposition, or partially rebuild that existing device rather than removing it and starting over.
Surgeons turn to these procedures when imaging or symptoms - pain, instability, a visible or palpable lump, or a healing fracture that isn't aligning properly - point to a hardware problem rather than a new injury. The goal is to restore the device to proper function or position using the smallest intervention that will do the job, which often means less recovery time than a full hardware exchange.
Anatomy & Axis Detail
Humeral Shaft, Left
Revision of the left humeral shaft covers correction of fixation hardware, typically an intramedullary rod or plate and screws, along the long diaphyseal segment of the left humerus used to stabilize a prior fracture. This portion of the bone is subject to bending and rotational forces with arm use, and the radial nerve courses closely along its posterior surface, so hardware-related irritation, loosening, or delayed union at the fixation site are common indications for revision. Because the shaft is a distinct body part from the humeral head, operative documentation should clarify that the diaphysis, rather than the proximal joint component, was addressed, along with confirming left laterality. The procedure should reflect an in-place adjustment or partial exchange rather than full hardware removal and replacement.
Approach: Open
Open approach means the surgeon cuts through skin, mucous membrane, or other tissue layers to physically expose the target site to view before performing the procedure. It gives direct visualization and hands-on access, distinguishing it from Percutaneous approaches where instruments pass through a small puncture without exposing the site. Open is typical for procedures needing wide access, such as most laparotomies.
Device: Autologous Tissue Substitute
Autologous Tissue Substitute identifies a device value where material harvested from the patient's own body, such as an autograft, is used to replace or reconstruct a body part. Its defining feature is tissue origin from the patient, setting it apart from Nonautologous Tissue Substitute, sourced from a donor or animal, and Synthetic Substitute, made of manufactured material.
Coding & Documentation
A coder should look for documentation that names the specific device involved (plate, screw, rod, wire, external fixator component) and describes what was done to it - repositioned, tightened, partially replaced, or otherwise corrected - rather than fully removed and swapped. Operative notes should specify the exact upper bone treated, since the qualifier and body part values differ by site.
The most common assignment error is confusing Revision with Removal followed by Insertion when the surgeon actually took the whole device out and put in a brand-new one; that scenario is coded as separate root operations, not Revision. Another frequent slip is coding Revision when the note describes a routine Change of an identical device without any correction of malfunction or malposition - that belongs under Change instead.