0RWF38Z
Revision Sternoclavicular Joint, Left to No Qualifier with Spacer, Percutaneous Approach
Procedural Specifications
| Clinical Axis | Detail Definition |
|---|---|
| Section | 0 Medical and Surgical |
| Body System | R Upper Joints |
| Operation | W Revision |
| Body Part | F Sternoclavicular Joint, Left |
| Approach | 3 Percutaneous |
| Device | 8 Spacer |
| Qualifier | Z No Qualifier |
Operation Definition
Correcting, to the extent possible, a portion of a malfunctioning device or the position of a displaced device
Procedure Overview
Revision procedures address a previously placed device in an upper joint, correcting a malfunction or fixing the position of a device that has shifted out of place. This applies to hardware such as joint prostheses, fixation plates, screws, or anchors that were implanted in an earlier surgery and are now causing problems, whether through loosening, wear, mechanical failure, or migration away from their intended location. The surgeon works to fix the existing device to the extent possible rather than necessarily removing and replacing the entire construct.
Patients need this type of procedure when a prior joint surgery, such as a shoulder or elbow reconstruction using anchors or hardware, develops complications months or years later. Symptoms prompting evaluation often include new pain, instability, clicking, or imaging findings showing hardware displacement or breakage. The goal of revision is to restore the device's intended function and relieve the symptoms it was causing without necessarily performing a full replacement operation.
Anatomy & Axis Detail
Sternoclavicular Joint, Left
The left sternoclavicular joint anchors the medial clavicle to the sternum's manubrium, forming the only skeletal articulation between the arm and trunk on that side. Revision here typically follows earlier surgical stabilization for atraumatic instability, degenerative changes, or infection-related reconstruction, correcting issues like graft loosening, recurrent subluxation, or malpositioned fixation without fully replacing the reconstructed tissue. The joint's proximity to the mediastinal great vessels, trachea, and lung apex makes posterior instability particularly consequential, so revision surgery is approached cautiously, frequently through the original incision with careful dissection to avoid vascular injury. Coding depends on whether the intervention adjusts or corrects an existing repair, as opposed to removing and substituting new graft material or hardware, which would instead fall under replacement or a combined removal-and-replacement sequence.
Approach: Percutaneous
Percutaneous describes entry by needle or instrument puncture through the skin or mucous membrane to reach the site of the procedure, without cutting the tissue open or using a visualizing scope. It differs from Open in that the site itself is never exposed, and from Percutaneous Endoscopic in that no endoscope is used to see internal structures. Common examples include needle biopsies and injections.
Device: Spacer
In Medical and Surgical procedures, a Spacer is a temporary, non-articulating device left in a joint or space after a component is removed, most often an antibiotic-impregnated cement block placed during a staged joint revision to control infection while preserving space and alignment. It is not intended to move like a real joint. It differs from an Articulating Spacer, which is shaped to permit some motion during the interim period, and from a permanent Synthetic Substitute.
Coding & Documentation
A Revision code is used when the documentation specifically describes correcting, adjusting, or repositioning a device that was already present in the joint, rather than removing a device and inserting a brand-new one, which would instead be coded as Removal followed by Insertion or captured under Replacement if the device itself is a joint substitute. Coders should look for terms like loosening, malposition, hardware failure, or device malfunction tied to an existing implant. A common assignment error is defaulting to Revision any time a patient returns to the operating room after a prior joint procedure, even when the surgeon actually removes the old device entirely and inserts a completely new one; in that scenario, separate Removal and Insertion or Replacement codes are more accurate. Coders should also confirm which specific joint and device are being revised, since multiple components may be addressed differently within the same operative session.