0SWJ37Z
Revision Tarsal Joint, Left to No Qualifier with Autologous Tissue Substitute, Percutaneous Approach
Procedural Specifications
| Clinical Axis | Detail Definition |
|---|---|
| Section | 0 Medical and Surgical |
| Body System | S Lower Joints |
| Operation | W Revision |
| Body Part | J Tarsal Joint, Left |
| Approach | 3 Percutaneous |
| Device | 7 Autologous Tissue Substitute |
| Qualifier | Z No Qualifier |
Operation Definition
Correcting, to the extent possible, a portion of a malfunctioning device or the position of a displaced device
Procedure Overview
Revision procedures correct a malfunctioning device already implanted in a lower joint, or reposition a device that has shifted out of place, without necessarily removing and replacing the whole implant. Examples include tightening a loosened hip component, adjusting a worn knee liner, or repositioning a dislocated joint implant back into alignment. The reason for surgery is a problem with hardware from an earlier operation rather than new injury to native tissue.
These procedures are often needed years after an initial joint replacement, as components can loosen, wear, or shift with normal use. Surgeons aim to fix the specific mechanical problem while preserving as much of the existing implant and surrounding bone as possible, since more extensive revisions carry greater surgical risk and longer recovery.
Anatomy & Axis Detail
Tarsal Joint, Left
Revision of a left tarsal joint involves correcting a prior surgical intervention within the hindfoot or midfoot complex formed by the talus, calcaneus, navicular, and cuboid bones, an area frequently treated surgically for collapsing flatfoot, arthritic pain, or nonunion following fusion. Because these joints bear substantial load transfer between the ankle and forefoot, failed hardware or a pseudarthrosis at a fusion site can cause persistent pain and deformity, requiring the surgeon to remove or reposition fixation, exchange failed components, or address bone healing problems directly. Since the tarsal region encompasses several distinct articulations, the documentation should make clear exactly which joint's earlier procedure is being revised and whether the intervention constitutes correction, replacement, or removal of the implanted material.
Approach: Percutaneous
Percutaneous describes entry by needle or instrument puncture through the skin or mucous membrane to reach the site of the procedure, without cutting the tissue open or using a visualizing scope. It differs from Open in that the site itself is never exposed, and from Percutaneous Endoscopic in that no endoscope is used to see internal structures. Common examples include needle biopsies and injections.
Device: Autologous Tissue Substitute
Autologous Tissue Substitute identifies a device value where material harvested from the patient's own body, such as an autograft, is used to replace or reconstruct a body part. Its defining feature is tissue origin from the patient, setting it apart from Nonautologous Tissue Substitute, sourced from a donor or animal, and Synthetic Substitute, made of manufactured material.
Coding & Documentation
Documentation needs to identify that an existing device was the target of correction, whether through repositioning, adjustment, or partial component exchange, and that the fix did not amount to a full swap of the entire prosthesis. Notes describing loosening, malposition, or component wear typically support Revision. A common error arises when a full component exchange occurs during a documented revision surgery; if the entire device is replaced, the correct root operation is Replacement, even though the surgeon may call it revision arthroplasty.